Kim Guadagno Releases TV Ad: “Yes”

West Long Branch, NJ – Today, Kim Guadagno released a new television ad, “Yes,” using his own words to highlight Phil Murphy’s stubborn insistence on raising taxes on all New Jerseyans if elected governor.

Click here to watch “Yes.”

“New Jerseyans don’t have to wonder if Phil Murphy will raise taxes if elected governor because he already told us he will,” said Dave Huguenel, Guadagno’s campaign manager. “Phil Murphy has promised to increase taxes by at least $1.3 billion, but we know that's just the beginning. To pay for his proposals, he will increase sales taxes, income taxes and property taxes. He even 'greatly welcomed' a new report calling for more tolls and higher MVC fees. After spending 23 years making millions at Goldman Sachs, Phil Murphy and his policies are wildly out-of-touch with New Jersey families who will be forced to move out of state if he becomes governor."

Yesterday, Kim Guadagno released another TV ad, “Break,” which can be watched by clicking here.


Narrator: Phil Murphy will raise property taxes, income taxes, sales taxes, and more. 

NJTV's Michael Aron: Are there other taxes you would raise to get the revenue necessary to keep your promises.

Phil Murphy: Yes. The answer is yes. It's a ton of money.

Narrator: We can't afford Phil Murphy.


If Elected, Phil Murphy Has Promised To Increase Taxes By At Least $1.3 Billion (Observer NJ, 8/17/2017)

According To The Star Ledger, Phil Murphy Supports Raising The Sales Tax And Reinstating The Estate Tax

  • “The Democratic hopefuls were able to find common ground, especially when it comes to taxes. They support raising taxes on New Jersey's millionaires and agree the state should bring back an estate tax that's in the process of being phased out, as well as restore a recent cut to the state's sales tax.” (The Star Ledger, 5/12/2017)

Phil Murphy Has Pledged To Raise Income Taxes By At Least $600 Million(Politico NJ, 9/12/2017)

Phil Murphy’s Policies Will Cause Property Taxes To Skyrocket Across New Jersey

  • Phil Murphy has refused to embrace an extension of the interest arbitration cap, which will force property taxes to skyrocket if allowed to expire. (Editorial: Asbury Park Press, 9/1/2017)
    • Asbury Park Press: “Murphy’s arbitration cap copout” (Editorial:Asbury Park Press, 9/1/2017)
    • “Murphy is taking the coward’s way out, ducking for cover behind the task force to avoid saying what he’s likely thinking, that he plans to reward those unions for their support by dumping the cap.” (Editorial: Asbury Park Press, 9/1/2017)
    • “Prior to any cap on property tax increases, average property tax increases statewide reached 7 percent in some years.” (Bergen Record, 8/29/2017)
    • “The arbitration cap, which limits to 2 percent the raises that police officers and firefighters can win once their contract disputes are taken to binding arbitration, was passed with broad bipartisan support in 2010 and extended in 2014.” (Bergen Record, 8/29/2017)
    • “The last annual report found the cap is working” (Editorial: The Star Ledger, 8/27/2017)
  • Phil Murphy does not have a plan to lower property taxes: To date, most of [Murphy's] proposals call for increasing spending... He has said nothing about actually reducing the tax burden... All those proposals will end up costing taxpayers more.” (Editorial: Asbury Park Press, 8/4/2017)
  • Phil Murphy said he will not renew Chapter 78, the bipartisan worker-benefits reform law passed in June of 2011 requiring workers to pay more for their health benefits, causing property taxes to skyrocket across New Jersey as “state and local governments could be forced to once again pick up more of the cost of their employees’ health benefits.” (NJEA, 9/12/2017; NJ Spotlight, 7/14/2015)
    • Phil Murphy to NJEA: "The notion of Chapter 78, first of all it's not something I ever would have encouraged, signed, and it's something I would never renew, period, full stop.” (NJEA, 9/12/2017)
  • Phil Murphy told the NJEA he opposes privatizing education support professionals (ESPs) like custodial and security personal, restricting a municipality’s ability to constrain costs. (NJEA, 9/12/2017)